Jason Jung vs Mitchell Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Jung vs M. Krueger
Jason Jung
TPE
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
6
Win
10
Played
4
Win
36
Age
31
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
856
C. Rank
207
114
Best Rank
135
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$350.6K
Career Money
$1.1M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Mitchell Krueger
USA
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
6
Win
10
Played
4
Win
36
Age
31
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
856
C. Rank
207
114
Best Rank
135
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$350.6K
Career Money
$1.1M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Jung 6 - 4 Krueger
They have played 23 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 14 and Mitchell Krueger winning 9. The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Jason Jung was at the Little Rock Challenger, 04-06-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jung | 6 |
| Krueger | 4 |
Last 10 H2H Matches:
(QF) Little Rock Challenger(06-04-21)
Mitchell Krueger
3
6
6
Jason Jung
6
2
1
(Q3) New York Open - New York(02-10-20)
Jason Jung
6
6
Mitchell Krueger
2
4
(R2) Indian Wells Challenger(02-26-19)
Jason Jung
6
6
Mitchell Krueger
1
4
J. Jung vs M. Krueger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $350,585 | Career Prize Money | $1,082,108 |
| 55.35% (414-334) | Career Total W/L | 52.62% (452-407) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 4 | Hard | 4 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 10 |
| 6 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
J. Jung vs M. Krueger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jason Jung has won 46.12% of points on their second serve, while Mitchell Krueger has won 46.80%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jason Jung, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mitchell Krueger has won 46.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.54% and 24.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jason Jung has saved 52.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mitchell Krueger has saved 58.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jason Jung has won 22.22% of matches played (W/L 2/7), with Mitchell Krueger winning 47.54% (W/L 29/32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26). Mitchell Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 124/97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 10/18).
- Player level: In the last year, Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7), where as Mitchell Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 10 times before with Jason Jung winning 6 times and Mitchell Krueger being victorious 4 times. They have played 23 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 14 and Mitchell Krueger winning 9.
- The last match between Jason Jung and Mitchell Krueger was at the Little Rock Challenger, 04-06-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jason Jung and Mitchell Krueger have played a deciding set 3 times, with Jason Jung winning 1 times and Mitchell Krueger 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Jason Jung winning 1, and Mitchell Krueger 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jason Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.78 while Mitchell Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 260.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jason Jung has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mitchell Krueger has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mitchell Krueger has converted 30.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jason Jung vs Mitchell Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Jung vs M. Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 14 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 112 | Games Won | 93 |
| 29 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 18 |
| 0:58:59 | Average Match Time | 0:58:59 |
| 59% (253/429) | 1st Serve % | 64% (255/401) |
| 72% (182/253) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (158/255) |
| 56% (99/176) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (69/146) |
| 60% (26/43) | Break Pts Won % | 37% (10/27) |
| 43% (174/401) | Return Points Win % | 34% (148/429) |
| 60% (6/10) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 71% (5/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 29% (2/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (2/7) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jung 45%, Krueger 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jung 48%, Krueger 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Jung 53%, Krueger 61%.
J. Jung Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025 | ||||
R1  Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka | L | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1  Arthur WeberA. Weber | W | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
| Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R1  James McCabeJ. McCabe | L | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida | L | 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025 | ||||
R1 Darwin BlanchD. Blanch | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
| Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
F Darwin BlanchD. Blanch | W | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF  Cedrik-Marcel StebeC. Stebe | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
QF  Inaki Montes-De La TorreI. Montes-De | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 Antoine GhibaudoA. Ghibaudo | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
J. Jung vs M. Krueger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.35% (414/334) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.62% (452/407) |
| 54.67% (949/787) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.67% (1067/959) |
| 51.99% (8605/7946) | Games Win/Loss | 51.10% (9910/9485) |
| 58.00% (308/223) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.56% (278/241) |
| 49.21% (31/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.11% (124/97) |
| 50.93% (55/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.96% (40/51) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1949 | Aces Total | 3016 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1621 | Total Double Faults | 1732 |
| 1:12:48 | Average Match Time | 1:24:12 |
| 566.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 535.44 |
| 63% (25533/40298) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31103/50222) |
| 68% (17485/25533) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (21515/31103) |
| 51% (7548/14765) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9698/19119) |
| 40% (1594/3943) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1884/4584) |
| 39% (16005/40933) | Return Points Win % | 38% (19471/50786) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Slam W/L | 46.03% (29/34) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Masters W/L | 36.36% (12/21) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.25% (37/43) | Main Tour W/L | 48.00% (36/39) |
| 53.93% (240/205) | Challenger W/L | 49.70% (248/251) |
| 69.59% (119/52) | Futures W/L | 67.20% (127/62) |
| 57% (409/720) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (441/842) |
| 9% (2/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 51% (122/241) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (134/295) |
| 52% (113/218) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (136/299) |
| 85% (416/352) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (459/374) |
| 15% (416/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (459/85) |
| 18% (331/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (400/74) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 28 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
J. Estevez1
R. Alujas5W1
1.148
W2
4.65
Fri, 28 Nov, 01:05 PM
PredictionP. Rodenasq
M. D. Krom4W1
1.57
W2
2.22
Fri, 28 Nov, 03:05 PM
Prediction
Y. DeminC. Vandermeersch2W1
2.72
W2
1.39
Fri, 28 Nov, 07:00 PM
Prediction
J. S. GomezqS. Kozlov8W1
3.64
W2
1.23
Fri, 28 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
J. Choinski1D. M. Aguilar5W1
1.5
W2
2.375
Fri, 28 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionI. Monzon4A. VasquezW1
2.28
W2
1.54
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Rio Noguchi Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Christoph Negritu Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 27th November 2025 Best Bets
27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 27th November 2025 Best Bets
26 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets
26 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets
25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Facundo Diaz AcostaFederico Agustin Gomez18:30
H2H 1-0
Mayar SherifCaroline Dolehide21:00
H2H 0-1
Sergio Callejon HernandoAlberto Barroso Campos13:15
H2H 0-0
Andrej MartinAlexey Vatutin14:05
H2H 0-0
Jan ChoinskiDaniel Merida Aguilar16:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola